Egypt's issues with GERD
To understand Egypt’s problem with the building of the dam
we have to look at the colonial ties to ownership of the Nile. A piece published
in ‘The Conversation’ discusses the colonial past that is at the root of the
dam politics at play now. From this article I learnt that after the British
occupation of Egypt they still had strong influence in the country till 1956
when the last of the British troops left. Due to this the Nile was mainly
managed by the British who benefitted from the irrigation the Nile provided in
Egypt for the textiles industry (The Conversation, 2021). In 1929 Egypt signed
an agreement with Britain that at the time gave them veto power over any
construction on the Nile and its tributaries that would affect the flow
downstream. This was followed by a 1959 agreement between Sudan and Egypt that effectively
allocated all the water to said countries, ignoring the water requirements of
the 9 other riparian countries upstream, despite them supplying the water
(Kimenyi and Mbaku, 2015). These agreements from a different time, are seen as
outdated and unfair for the other countries that could use the Nile for development
but are limited by an agreement they didn’t sign. However, from Egypt’s point
of view these give them the protection they need due to their heavy reliance on
the Nile for freshwater.
Egypt’s initial issue with the Dam was the filling period it
would have, and because talks over the past 10 years didn’t result in progress
the Dam has now been filled, and now their new focus is on the management of
the water in periods of drought. The fear of greater pressure on water
resources that this Dam has created has frayed hydro political relations
between the countries, and with 95% of freshwater coming from the Nile, Egypt
find it difficult to look past their own water insecurity to see the
developmental benefits of the Dam (El-Nashar and Elyamany, 2018).
Linking back to the last blog where I discussed the emotion
held by the nations over the development of this Dam, I believe that the
historical claim that Egypt has to the Nile has led to an inflexible
perspective of how the Dam could benefit them. This is because the overwhelming
thought is anger at Ethiopia for starting a project upstream without any consultation,
which they believe to be their right. During talks Egypt seem unwilling to give
up their rights afforded to them by the 1929 and 1959 treaties, but for the
upstream countries this is necessary for a new treaty that would see the Nile have
modern governance with all 11 countries being allocated water resources. In the
next blog I will briefly discuss Sudan’s views on the Dam and then look at how
both Sudan and Egypt may potentially be affected by drought with the new Dam,
by looking at academic articles that model the Niles response to drought with
this Dam in place.
How responsible are Egypt with their attitude towards maintaining dominance over the Nile for a break down in negotiations with Ethiopia?
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment. I think their reluctance to negotiate a new agreement, alongside Sudan has been a big cause in the breakdown. However, Ethiopia are still at fault as they aren't willing to take Egypt and Sudan's fear of water insecurity seriously enough. That was shown by them filling the Dam over four years instead of over 12 years like Egypt wanted for greater water security.
Delete